Ha yes, I'm definitely more sympathetic to the author's perspective here than Lakens'. I'm just always dissatisfied by discussions on the relationship between open science and neoliberalalism

This is whole thread a useful framing. So many debates in metascience have parallels in broader discussions about promoting and balancing prosocial behavior, autonomy, efficiency, policing, values etc…

Good to see all the slides and videos of talks from a meeting on Behavioural Sciences Meets Metascience, earlier this month. Aim is to get more interaction between different disciplines in this space. economics.web.ox.ac.uk/behavioural-...

Behavioural Science Meets Metascience

11 - 12 September 2024

Tweet inspired by recent convos with @markfabian.bsky.social@devezer.bsky.social#metascience should be a social science. As such it needs to learn from all attempts at social reform and not repeat its mistakes.

💬Der kommende Online-Talk mit Dr. Nora Wickelmaier (Referentin für Forschungsmethoden & Forschungsdatenmanagement) & Catharina Oerter (Referentin für Nachhaltigkeit & Institutsentwicklung) widmet sich grundlegenden Fragen zu #OpenScience#Nachhaltigkeit: ⬇️

Or it’s not p-hacking because you are doing transparently exploratory research and not using p-values for inference.

This is not at all true. Many of the best ideas in labs where data is cheap are conceived and tested rapidly. And the best analysis plans are often devised after viewing the data and a replication can follow to verify that it's not p-hacking.

me to science reform, together with open access. I know my argument is half-baked, but anyway that's my prediction. Ethics documents are the other freestanding documents held / known of by others besides the authors, besides preregistration, that provide some kind of paper trail.

direct investigators to have specific expectations about the sort of records that should exist at certain times. Extending it is basically a crude substitute / awkward way to bring in open notebook science (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-no...), which pre-dates open science and was what first attracted

3. Ausweitung von Open Science: Wissen gehört allen! Offene Zugänglichkeit zu Forschungsergebnissen fördert Innovation und Fortschritt. (3/5)