BLUE
B
babarakas.bsky.social
@babarakas.bsky.social
3 followers6 following149 posts
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

Certainly, the nyt could write a follow up story explaining to readers that police are in fact able to arrest violent criminals regardless of immigration status and treat the questiin as seriously as whether biden is old or Hillary may have had a few emails classified after receipt.

0
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

Speaking of policy questions, have the embedded trump pr flacks ( Hagerman and swan) bothered to find out what trump means with his bloody mass deportation campaign. It seems like the most important question of this campaign but one which nyt would never even pretend to ask as campaign surrogates

1
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

The NPR top of the hour coverage at 7am was literally just an interview from a republican watch party. It made absolutely no sense unless npr wants to help trump win

0
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

What is the most concise explanation for their radically inconsistent treatment of age in the 2024 election or between the national security implications of Clinton's email server and trump storing classified docs in MAL bathrooms and refusing to return them?

0
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

Political msm are not serious people and deserve as much scorn as the Roy children

0
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

Well at least they have been consistent about the importance of safeguarding national security documents or whether being indicted should be a fatal blow to a campaign

0
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

Seriously cnn is just Zaslav toadies trying to help trump win. Walz has a credibility issue for not clearly differentiating ivf iui but trump is free to lie all day every day. I see their right wing shift drove away their viewership, which begs the question of why they just decided to suck

0
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

From emails to biden old but trump isn't, the only logical explanation for political msm coverage is that they simply want trump to win. It is the logical throughline of the last 10 years. These are not serious people with any plausible interest in informing the public about the elections stakes

0
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

Funny how cnn absolutely refuses to cover trump's delusional statements but parse every word harris and walz say. It is almost like it is a propaganda network as opposed to anything resembling journalism. Amazing decision to jettison all credibility and most of their viewers in service to trump

0
Bbabarakas.bsky.social

But did he retire from the national guard after 24 years?

0
B
babarakas.bsky.social
@babarakas.bsky.social
3 followers6 following149 posts