Bruh they wouldn’t have charged him in the first place if they were in the tank for him.

It takes a lot of liberties with the source material. Personally I really liked that about the series but if you’re going to be disappointed by lack of fealty, you may want to pass.

I hope he gets compensation from the victim restitution fund. Poor guy.

These people are all good at wearing shorts. They must be right.

Also is the real measuring stick here how pleasant the protests were?

Awesome article, awesome act!

Can’t even begin to get in the head of someone writing articles in Derek Chauvin’s defense in 2024. How miserable must their lives be to need that?

Fwiw the overreach problem is that while a defendant has to intentionally damage property, the law doesn’t clearly state that they have to know the property is religious. One could be convicted for secular graffiti on the side of a mall that included a church.

“He acknowledged some concerns about potential ‘overreach,’ but noted that defendants in these cases would remain eligible for suspended sentences.” Fundamental misunderstanding of how prosecutions work, not to mention the minimal benefit that a suspended sentence is in this state.

We don’t have a word for it but a lot of people refer to it as “so you hate waffles” discourse after the following tweet: