BLUE
Profile banner
christph.bsky.social
@christph.bsky.social
Statistics, machine learning, causal inference
102 followers202 following106 posts
christph.bsky.social

Will there be remote participation options?

1
christph.bsky.social

I agree, everything beyond the dowhy ecosystem is abandoned or unmaintained

0
christph.bsky.social

This is probably my very naive view, but in a chain or fork scenario, A and B would be correlated, but uncorrelated if conditioned for C. If you apply that and the collider knowledge to subsets of variables you might get a pretty good idea of the underlying graph.

0
christph.bsky.social

I agree, however, causal discovery methods are not totally mumbo jumbo. For example, in a DAG A➡️C⬅️B, A and B would be uncorrelated. But if you condition on C they correlate. This can be tested using algorithms, discovering some (maybe causal) structure.

1
Reposted by
KHkrhornberger.bsky.social

These guys get it! “Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: A mirage or an oasis?”

Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: A mirage or an oasis?
Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: A mirage or an oasis?

0
Profile banner
christph.bsky.social
@christph.bsky.social
Statistics, machine learning, causal inference
102 followers202 following106 posts