This is a terrible lie. They asked for a speaking slot 3 weeks ago.
They extended an olive branch by asking for a few minutes to affirm their humanity. In exchange the speaker would have advocated for voting Harris. Accepting that branch is such an easy layup. If you're defending them not taking it you're just too lost to continue on with.
My point, from minute 1, has been that we don't have a ceasefire because Israel doesn't want one because the goal of all this is to kill Palestinians. That you are arguing with me tells me you disagree.
The official Uncommitted delegation cannot claim to control or speak for everyone who wants to stop American bombs from turning Palestinian children into soup. By making that the standard you are saying there's no reasonable requests the Uncommitted movement can make.
And you accuse me of being too dense, lol.
Do you think affirming Palestinian humanity would have hurt Kamala's chances of winning the election?
So Kinziger has switched parties and is on board with the Democratic platform then?
They've been the opposite of vague. They told the DNC to pick a speaker that was palatable to them and to fully vet the speech and were told no.
You think Kamala's chances are completely unchanged in Michigan regardless of how they handled this specific situation?