Wenn sie anstatt W1 TT zu W3 nun W2 TT zu W3 ausschreiben, wäre es ja eig sogar sehr cool. Sie wollen ja explizit Nachwuchs, keine arrivierten Profs. In D sind gefühlt die meisten W1 ja schon komplett professorabel mit mehreren Jahren Post-Doc Erfahrung. Warum also nicht gleich als W2 anstellen.
Preparing a seminar session on questionable research practices and why to avoid them for my psychology Master students. I'm sure that there are tons of good papers and resources so I don't have to reinvent the wheel. Please share and post your favourites! #OpenScience#AcademicSky
Perhaps: Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). doi.org/10.1177/2515...doi.org/10.1177/1948...doi.org/10.1177/0956...doi.org/10.1037/a002...doi.org/10.1027/1864...
So in my field of Comm this means I don’t get to review at all — nice 🤓
Thank you! But it seems this is meant for papers with preprints?
No joke. I've now been invited by four different journals to review the same paper.
on Daniel Kahneman: what a profound loss. he was an intellectual giant, and as close to the platonic ideal of a scientist as one can hope to see in this life. i’ll add to the enormous pile of anecdotes people have shared with 3 of my own that hopefully convey what an enormous influence he had.
New chapter in which I discuss the privacy calculus, make links to the privacy paradox, and suggest a new probabilistic understanding. Originally published in @masurphil.bsky.socialosf.io/preprints/so...
Yes. It has to be said, because there seem to be quite a few who don’t see what should be obvious
