what i was getting at is i think having less stylistic contrast between the debaters puts more emphasis on their actual words. I want to see apples to apples and oranges to oranges. It would be entertaining to see harris and vance fight and play off the camera with equal aptitude.
you are confused because you are treating my stoned thought with far more respect than it deserves
tim walz is intense, i'm scared he's gonna use his giant froglike mouth to eat me
two old men yelling at each other is legible. a genx and millennial arguing would be easier to watch. I wouldn't have to decode the boomerisms into regular modern english.
it would have been better if it were trump v walz and vance v harris in certain ways - I think the generational differences make debates sort of weird sometimes.
tim walz may have relatively good policies however he makes fucking insane facial expressions
Vance plays the split screen better
back on my bullshit (walking to the grocery store)
it's fucking crazy that my life has been primarily derailed by basic-ass allergies.