He also freed Iran from International inspection that was preventing them from executing their nuclear program, in exchange for…. nothing.

To be fair, this is true for essentially every Microsoft product.

“Look, if you keep warning people, over and over, not to eat the poison mushrooms, eventually someone is going to eat the poison mushrooms.” It’s just logic.

I’m not a lawyer, and I’m very happy about the result of this decision, but doesn’t the logic in that first paragraph seem kind of… broken? How is that different from saying, “If we can create a law that prohibits murder, we could create a law that would require that you murder someone?”

“I have _concepts_ of a plan.” — A phrase that immediately forfeits a debate

You forgot the air quotes around the word “undecided”.

Some misinformation in today's US presidential debate about who bears the cost of tariffs. So let's talk about how tariffs affect what you pay for a suit. 🧵 (1/20)Some misinformation in today's US presidential debate about who bears the cost of tariffs. So let's talk about how tariffs affect what you pay for a suit. 🧵 (1/20)

To be fair, a few of them are people entirely disinterested in politics, and wouldn’t willingly watch a televised debate. And those people would fake a heart attack to avoid going on a cable news panel.

It’s amazing how the same people who think it’s impossible for us to stop 2 degrees of climate change temperature on the planet _where we live_ also believe we can terraform a planet where we can’t breathe & that averages -80 degrees F.

"tiered" -> "rugged"