"Why is it that lawyers think that the principles underpinning financial remedies are clear, and yet the public are often perplexed? The issue is one of communication, or rather translating the law into plain English." Read here: https://buff.ly/3BaxeIt
Rotenberg v Rotenberg & Ors [2024] EWFC 185. Peel J. Where landscape on the ground was v different from that which was envisaged at the time of the order an executory order could be reframed under the Thwaite jurisdiction. Summary by Elizabeth Bowden here tinyurl.com/yc8xzcac
RM v WP [2024] EWFC 191 (B). HHJ Hess. HHJ Hess considers when a property becomes the family home and therefore matrimonialised, and whether it can become un-matrimonialised; and makes use of the Galbraith Tables re pensions. Summary by Elizabeth Bowden of College Chambers tinyurl.com/m8je59bb
It is not often that a family law blog warns ordinary hard-working honest family lawyers that they might be unwitting criminals. This is that blog. You should read it. Read here: https://buff.ly/3TxNedL#FinancialRemedies
Select whether you would like to receive an email update any day that new content is added or a weekly round-up - weekly round-up is sent on Friday at 3 pm. Sign up here: https://buff.ly/3XlVOgy#FinancialRemedies
Can’t believe we’re back here again, almost 20 years later, having to deal with AML issues because we might get paid by someone who hasn’t declared his income to HMRC and we then buy some apples with the proceeds:
How should provisions of a court order that are in dispute be construed? Read here: https://buff.ly/47mxb88#FinancialRemedies
How should provisions of a court order that are in dispute be construed? This question most often arises in the context of consent orders. Read the blog here: https://buff.ly/47mxb88#FinancialRemedies
