The social implications: VR and even AR computing is inherently isolating: one is either totally cut off from the physical world (classic VR), or one person's picture of the "world" is not necessarily the same as another person's (VR, but AR as well). 4/

In contrast Dynamicland is inherently a social experience at least for those present in the same space: everything is laid out on the table or walls or whatever and everyone has the same view of things (assuming of course typical physical capabilities - issues of accessibility are still relevant) 5/