BLUE
immanent.bsky.social
@immanent.bsky.social
mainlining the discovery feed directly into your immanent pathways is depraved when they were intended for far logical goals suitable to the appropriate objects of regard.
7 followers8 following98 posts
Reposted by
KAatherton.bsky.social

SPOCK: My freak to your freak. My thots to your thots

5
Reposted by
CPcrs1.bsky.social
immanent.bsky.social

don't feel bad for him at all. he has an incessant need to reply to everyone. he needs therapy and he needs to quit nyt

1
Reposted by
PLphillewis.bsky.social

The latest cover of the New Yorker:

41
Reposted by
RDdeonandan.bsky.social

6
immanent.bsky.social

you can just watch sports. you don't have to look at social media, and we certainly don't need to see another existential comics post.

0
immanent.bsky.social

a lot of brainrot there, yep.

0
Reposted by
KKkbkorb.bsky.social

Explainer: There's exactly one standard in America. If Dems call out Trump for his fascism, it's incitement. If Republicans demand violence, it's free speech.

4
Reposted by
NGnicholasgrossman.bsky.social

As a staunch opponent of political violence, I greatly prefer when national leaders respond to it by condemning violence and expressing concern for victims (image 1) rather than encouraging violence and laughing at victims (image 2).

2
immanent.bsky.social
@immanent.bsky.social
mainlining the discovery feed directly into your immanent pathways is depraved when they were intended for far logical goals suitable to the appropriate objects of regard.
7 followers8 following98 posts