at this point i think “harris needs more details” is just the way, refracted through consumption of punditry, that these voters are saying that a) they don’t pay much attention and b) they don’t want to vote for a woman www.nytimes.com/2024/09/28/u...

💯 This is a job interview. She’s a former DA, prosecutor, Senator, and now VP. He’s a criminal and a reality TV star who has used Chapter 11 six times to save his businesses. She has a positive attitude and works well in team environments. He lies and wants to be a dictator. Who should the the job?

It's not enough? What the fuck is wrong with you?

It is strange the lengths to which people will go to tell the world that they possess neither a computer or five minutes' worth of intellectual curiosity.

The constant "she doesn't have policies other than 'not Trump'" is exhausting and disingenuous. It is SO exhausting that I briefly thought that it was Richard Dawkins being quoted, and the paper telling us that he was Black. :-D

Yup

My one consolation is that if anybody has figured out how to handle being the only one in the race being held to unreasonable standards of impossible perfection, it's the Black woman.

How people can criticize her like this when Trump cannot put together a coherent sentence on policy is absolutely insane to me.

Area swing voter wants President with "meat and potatoes."

I can actually see a case for "needing more" x from Harris, simply due to Trump's monopoly on our attention. Harris is barely covered at all. If 90% of your info is about Trump (who you've known for years already) and 10% is about Harris, you might feel you need more info on her. 🤷‍♀️

Black with capital B.