BLUE
Login
Profile banner
JM
Jason Miklian
@jasonmiklian.com
Sr Researcher, Univ of Oslo. Business & Peace | ESG | Climate & Conflict Book: The Vortex amzn.to/40lzIeW
893 followers2.2k following386 posts
OverviewPostsReplies
Reposted by Jason Miklian
TTtadethompson.bsky.social

Open self-promotion thread. Fiction, non-fiction, film, art, academic stuff, or your baby's first steps. Indie, non-indie, all welcome. Anything and everything. What are you up to? Where can we buy or get it? The only rule is, play nice with the dreams of others.

200
Reposted by Jason Miklian
KTbrainnotonyet.bsky.social

Made a lil starter pack of people talking about extremism and the modern threat environment we are in.

13
Reposted by Jason Miklian
MQmauraquint.bsky.social

Tried to make one of these starter pack things, but I couldn't find everyone I wanted to add for some reason. Still, a good follow list go.bsky.app/GzohuLw

21
JMjasonmiklian.com

Feeds are incredible for power users. Starter packs best for casual users. both have their place

1
JMjasonmiklian.com

good list, no need to shorten imo, it should be a one click deal for those looking to bounce over

2
Reposted by Jason Miklian
SVsebvanbaalen.bsky.social

Is your Bluesky feed missing in conflict analysis? I made a starter pack of peace and conflict scholars to follow here. DM me if you want to be included. #Conflictskygo.bsky.app/7o8tZt2

8
JMjasonmiklian.com

any chance I can get added? Thanks for making it!

0
Reposted by Jason Miklian
LOlolgop.bsky.social

I'm trying to create a starter pack to lure people over from Twitter. Let me know what you think of this.I'm trying to create a starter pack to lure people over from Twitter. Let me know what you think of this.

Politics is My Passion
Politics is My Passion

Join the conversation

84
Reposted by Jason Miklian
TBkleinman.bsky.social

I created a starter pack of people who like sporps go.bsky.app/KbxjMtX

57
Reposted by Jason Miklian
Smehr.nz

this is pretty amazing: @lucinauddin.bsky.socialwww.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/ac... summary of the case:

The Publisher Defendants’ Scheme has three primary components. First, the Publisher Defendants agreed to not compensate scholars for their labor, in particular not to pay for their peer review services (the “Unpaid Peer Review Rule”). In other words, the Publisher Defendants agreed to fix the price of peer review services at zero. The Publisher Defendants also agreed to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the Publisher Defendants’ journals. In the “publish or perish” world of academia, the Publisher Defendants essentially agreed to hold the careers of scholars hostage so that the Publisher Defendants could force them to provide their valuable labor for free.
Second, the Publisher Defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time (the “Single Submission Rule”). The Single Submission Rule substantially reduces competition among the Publisher Defendants, substantially decreasing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly. The Single Submission Rule also robs scholars of negotiating leverage they otherwise would have had if more than one journal offered to publish their manuscripts. Thus, the Publisher Defendants know that if they offer to publish a manuscript, the submitting scholar has no viable alternative and the Publisher Defendant can then dictate the terms of publication.
Third, the Publisher Defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year (the “Gag Rule”). From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendants grant permission. Moreover, when the Publisher Defendants select manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants will often require scholars to sign away all intellectual property rights, in exchange for nothing. The manuscripts then become the actual property of the Publisher Defendants, and the Publisher Defendants charge the maximum the market will bear for access to that scientific knowledge.
11
Profile banner
JM
Jason Miklian
@jasonmiklian.com
Sr Researcher, Univ of Oslo. Business & Peace | ESG | Climate & Conflict Book: The Vortex amzn.to/40lzIeW
893 followers2.2k following386 posts
HomePopularExplore