BLUE
Profile banner
JR
Jess Rohmann
@jlrohmann.bsky.social
PhD, she/her | Neuroepidemiology Likes: improving science & improvising comedy @ Charité in Berlin #EpiSky #CausalInference
245 followers342 following70 posts
JRjlrohmann.bsky.social

You're right. Perhaps the concise yet complete reporting is the art more than the science. Indeed, "simplicity is the ultimate sophistication".[da Vinci] ;)

0
JRjlrohmann.bsky.social

Not exactly what you meant, but did you know that certain mathematical journals (and surely others) have dedicated poetry sections in every issue? If I find an example, I will post later!

1
JRjlrohmann.bsky.social

This study had several limitations. Time was not fixed but moved forward. We only budgeted for 1 month of 25% analyst support. We tried to investigate the study's limitations, but this limited our study's investigation. There was not enough coffee on campus after 3pm.

0
JRjlrohmann.bsky.social

I will end it here (this was circulating on Twitter last week) with my main takeaway from the workshop: we should prioritizing our writing (and writing time) more! So... go write :) And come hear Bill's words of wisdom next time he comes to Berlin to give a course (hopefully again soon!)

0
JRjlrohmann.bsky.social

A few suggestions from Bill on beating perfection paralysis & moving past writer's block. We also talked a lot about procrastination and how it's better to go for a head-clearing or idea generating walk than spending break time on social media/emails. It was tough, but I resisted during our breaks!

1
JRjlrohmann.bsky.social

Third: perfection paralysis = low productivity. I know this one firsthand. We often get in our own way of making forward progress in drafting manuscripts by being too picky. What do to about it?

1
JRjlrohmann.bsky.social

Second: most important body part for writing? Your butt! (or feet if you use a standing desk). You have to show up for it to happen... this goes hand-in-hand with his advice to write 15 min. every day.

1
JRjlrohmann.bsky.social

First: the litany of limitations. Bill suggests avoiding "Our study had many limitations" entirely and instead weaving the limitations into a seamless discussion (together with existing literature, own findings). Not possible? Instead of list, give each lim. a paragraph with enough relevant context!

a man in a suit and tie sits at a table with a microphone
a man in a suit and tie sits at a table with a microphone

Alt: Stephen Colbert quickly pages through a seemingly endless list

1
JRjlrohmann.bsky.social

Scientists are writers. This week at #ChariteBerlin@billmiller-epi.bsky.social#ScientificWriting#EpiSky Sharing a few of my favorite moments ⤵️ (with permission)

Slide describing the "litany of limitations" and why we should avoid the very common practice of listing several limitations in a single paragraph of the Discussion session of scientific manuscripts
1
Profile banner
JR
Jess Rohmann
@jlrohmann.bsky.social
PhD, she/her | Neuroepidemiology Likes: improving science & improvising comedy @ Charité in Berlin #EpiSky #CausalInference
245 followers342 following70 posts