I’m experimenting a bit with instagram - is this content that people appreciate? Need to probably train myself to speak more instragrammable 😅 www.instagram.com/reel/C3SnJ_b...

Taking the opportunity to promote my PhD student’s latest paper and my lab’s brand new instagram account all at once ☺️ www.instagram.com/p/C2zwUOMoP9...

It is not yet out, we are still working on it

Uugh I clearly haven’t figured out how to do a proper thread yet 😬 Sorry guys - my answers are a bit disorganized @tflangkaas.bsky.social

And we know about human biases in general (self affirmation bias etc). There is no reason to believe that therapists are immune to this.

Of course, any research in this area has methodological issues in the sense that there is no gold standard for Tx success - so researchers, clinicians and clients may all be on their own definition of Tx succes, making them inherently incomparable. But there are larger trends, like Tim mentioned.

ROM made expectations more realistic, but only when expected recovery curves were used. This does suggest some overestimation of outcomes. We asked for success cases because deterioration is hard to predict as it is relatively rare (5-15%)

Sorry, late to the party - LCov makes me behind on most things these days! I agree with @tkaiser.science that there is clearly divergence in perspectives, I ran a study in which we measured therapists expectations every 5 sessions and they did change over time.

Absolutely- this is why we have two chapters of our book devoted to implementation. Including addressing therapists’ attitudes

We have written an entire book about this by now: www.mheducation.co.uk/routine-outc...