Yes it also gets much more complicated when you're comparing things from the past to today!
lifestyles but indistinguishable morphologically and sometimes even genetically. But plants and animals for the most part rely on species (though some plant people argue against it). And in a legal/policy context (eg ESA), it’s necessary.
To add to what Josh said, it also depends a great deal on what group you’re talking about, and in what context. For bacteria and viruses, “species” are essentially meaningless. Many fungi also hybridize a lot and evolve very fast, so it’s not too useful. Others may be cryptic, different specialized/
Thank you, I was trying to remember his name and all I could think of was Steve Innskeep who sounds different. It's not *exactly* Greene but they clearly based not just the voice but the speaking style on him. Close enough he could sue over it.
Early voting starts in less than three weeks in NC.
I remember when the Republican candidate made a big deal out of the fact that Obama thought Russia was lower down on our list of enemies.
Also, after he won my (slightly pre-boomer) mother sighed and said "well we got through Nixon, we'll get through this." She wasn't so optimistic by the end.
Yep! And often if a student does take it on, they find out (typically after trying for three years or so) just *why* nobody has worked on it for so long, and end up either doing something it incompletely so it never gets published, or rushing out something much smaller in order to finish.
The original version had his SSN and other personal info. I deleted that page and it uploaded to Drive with no problems. It looks like he's posted a redacted version now.