1. A short thread about science reform, based on a conversation I've been having with several wonderful colleagues. As people push to insert more and more bureaucracy into the practice of scientific research so as to police a few bad apples, Iâm reminded of a FOX News piece Iâve written about.
In this example drawn from a Fox News story, we demonstrate how Fermi estimation can cut through bullshit like a hot knife through butter.
Das Ministerium liefert schon gar nichts, selbst die Wire-Chats mĂŒsste geleakt werden
Es reicht, wirklich, schon lÀngst so, denke ich auch. Und noch mehr als 3300 Leute -> docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
"schau mal, die da, haha"
A voice-over of one of them? A half-page of text would do, I think. you can speed run it by turning speech to text on and then just talking about it while it runs to have first draft, editing and final cut đ
"gemeinsam einen ergebnisoffenen Reformprozess" = our success, your failures ""Expertenkreis" aus genau jenen Akteuren zu grĂŒnden zu fördern, die auch in den "informellen Fachdialogprozess"" = give my friends a well paid counselling gig Is it at least written by a human or just LLM hallucinations?
Do they at least have a plan of a concept? Or, maybe, an idea of a plan of a concept?
@jbertolotti.bsky.social#PhysicsFactlet, do you want to send an email?
Has everyone in đĄPhotonics feed seen this announcement? www.optica.org/get_involved... 1. Create: Your 5-minute simulation video. 2. Submit: Email your entry to tgactivities@optica.org by 07.10.24. 3. Win: Five outstanding entries will be selected to host virtual workshops and receive the prize.
Well in many cases remoteness works this way, and in general people seldomly think about all the tech going on in background, press the button - works - next.