This! I stand next to every word of this excellent article. Thank you ๐ Be positive, be patient, be proactive, and you'll be happier.
In defence of BlueSky. (It isnโt a naturist social media platform). The latest blog from A Comfort of Naturists: Free Subscription. Read the latest instalment and get full access to previous posts. aconnz.substack.com/p/in-defence...
What you into? ๐ฎ๐พ
I'm hoping to go down to Dartmoor this year. There is a group that lives slightly nearer than I do that has a WhatsApp group. I could never make it work so I left it, but I still have a contact or two. There might be a thread or two on the BN members forum.
Welcome! ๐ค
Ultimately, those genuine nudies who really want BSky to work but get frustrated/angry (like me I confess) are only hurting themselves leaving or refusing to mark/appeal as we are part of a "medical trial" here. Without giving BSky and the AI our judgements, the AI can't learn. A downward spiral. 4/
In short, the devs need to see those appeals, and how nudies mark up their posts in the first place, and feed that back into the learning process i.e. the "scoring" carrot/stick system the AI uses to judge its success and therefore evolve. 3/
Training an AI towards making the distinction a priori rather than use actual data is a good point, but you also need real world observation of humans putting context via their collective judgement, rather than a small room of devs with personal prejudice leanings. 2/
I guess we must think of how the devs would feel about the reverse situation, that sexual and non-sexual be simply called nudity. In this case no appealling would ever be done! I'm trying to constructively think as to what the devs might have done different to meet the same goals, but please us. 1/
Result! ๐ค