I continue to try to keep an open mind. But after reading this latest post, retraction notice (www.nature.com/articles/s41...www.nature.com/articles/s41...www.chronicle.com/article/this...osf.io/4k5sf), things don't look great...

We'll also have PCI Psychology (@psych.peercommunityin.org) soon(ish) for all your non-RR preprints :)

Agreed!

Sharing this paper from 2021 with @abeba.bsky.socialhttps://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v29i2.124899

PCI gives you the flexibility and power to go as high or low prestige as you have the time, money, sanity, and willingness to be part of a fucked up system.

I love them - total game-changer for me. But may not necessarily work for all methods/personalities…

Easy for me to say with tenure, but I’m starting to regret playing the prestige game. I’ve found @peercommunityin.bsky.social@pci-regreports.bsky.socialosf.io/p37zj/

I'm also happy @stephaniemlee.bsky.socialosf.io/preprints/ps...

I've been lukewarm towards preregistration so far bec I view it as a procedural, bureaucratic tool whose benefits are vastly overstated. Careful research planning, otoh, is something I believe in, for which you don't need prereg but to the extent that it facilitates planning, it can be useful. >

Agreed! This is why I greatly prefer Registered Reports to standard preregistration: much more helpful to get external feedback before it’s too late to correct experimental design flaws: bsky.app/profile/patr...