I’d pay Mayweather vs. Pacquiao pay-per-view prices to watch Kyle Clark moderate that debate.
This is an egregious example of this scheme, but the watered down version should be equally scrutinized. They’re all selling practices and funneling the proceeds through life insurance policies and charitable remainder trusts, almost completely avoiding taxation.
Maybe a national newspaper with some reporting resources can interview a split-ticket Gallego voter.
This is a really important topic. But we also need to stop letting people modify motor vehicles to be more dangerous than is allowed by manufacturers. The trucks are bad enough out of the factory, but the 6-8 inch lifts are downright menacing.
What should we make of the down-ballot polling right now? Do the senate results we’re seeing in competitive states really suggest ticket splitting? Or is there a disconnect in methodology we should more carefully consider?
How useful is national polling anymore when electoral votes are more or less decided in 45 states? Should we not take more seriously (and dedicated more polling resources) to PA, NC, MI, GA, etc?
Literally no one mentioned it in the office this morning. Not even shruggingly.
My guess is they got stuck on the cat thing.
In which we blur every line in the financial system until none of it can ever be monitored or regulated ever again.
But that’s exactly it. Everyone was so poor and underemployed, we all lived in communal houses in cheap city centers, started bands/art collectives, threw wild parties in dilapidated warehouses. There was nothing about the job market to take seriously—so we didn’t.