How else would he effect a permanent ethnic cleansing if he didn’t maintain Israeli sovereignty? The goal is to make life impossible in the military regime (all infra destroyed, no permits, etc) so that Israeli settlements can be built in the future. Likud officially supports River to Sea for Jews

Israel is committing one of the worst crimes against humanity. And the entire establishment of the US supports it. Sometimes you ask yourself how genocides so blatantly happen despite complete awareness by all levels of the government and media happen. This is how.

Nothing significant, just previous-generation Hasbara arguments that are not even used anymore since they’re so easily debunked. Basically denying the culture and history of Palestinians. Had to block him too 😂

For American politicians, it’s about silencing criticism against its strategic outpost. They also have a subset of their voters who support the establishment of Israel due to some eschatological beliefs. For Israeli politicians/apologists, it’s about silencing criticism of war crimes/apartheid

Oh, I didn’t know humans with a continuous history and culture had to have a Westphalian sense of nationhood to not be ethnically cleansed from land they’ve lived on for millennia. Also a simple Google search would show you all you’re looking for. Anyone can, in fact, to debunk your wild claims

Ah yes, the good old ‘antisemite’, ‘Jew-hater’ tag when you’ve failed to mount a sufficient rebuttal.

“Why oh why didn’t Palestinians accept the fair solution of giving Jews the majority of the land despite Jews legally owning 7% of the land and Palestinians outnumbering them 2 to 1 😫😫”

Palestinians are the indigenous people. Their DNA matches ancient Israelites. You do realize “Arabs” is a superset, and encompasses a wide range of ethnicities & ancestry? And the genetic makeup of the Arabian Peninsula is not the same as Palestinians. I mean, it’s obvious by looking at the faces

“Ancestral homeland” Which moral principle do you follow which allows for reclamation of erstwhile rule after 2000 years and also includes displacement of those who have been living there just as long there if not longer?

My personal definition is a severe type of ethnic chauvinism which almost defines the purpose of the country or permeates all aspects of the government. In practice, most immoral when they also rule a people who are not of that ethnicity and actively disenfranchise and harm. Think Apartheid SA