The Northern District of Texas has issued an order requiring Brazil to turn Twitter back on
100x as many people see the social headline as read the body of the story! it's *more* important to get it right
If they're going to value ChatGPT at $100 billion+, shouldn't it be able to accurately answer questions like how many ls are in "billion"? www.wsj.com/tech/ai/open...
Not much is known at this point, but depending on how this plays out, this could be yet another effort by Republicans to undermine direct democracy—and abortion rights specifically.
But if there is no conflict and both measures come into effect, then it seems possible that the anti-abortion amendment's existence could persuade courts to narrowly construe the abortion-rights measure.
Based on an utterly implausible reading of a statute, the Nebraska Secretary of State seems to believe that the Governor has the power to determine whether there is a conflict—which could give Governor Jim Pillen the power to say that there *isn't* a conflict.
In Nebraska, if two conflicting amendments pass at the same election, the one receiving the most affirmative votes controls. But that's never happened before, so how would the existence of a conflict be determined?
My latest in Guaranteed Republics: Last week, the Nebraska Secretary of State certified two abortion-related constitutional amendments for the ballot this year. He might have also previewed a legal theory that could nullify the abortion-rights measure.
In an innocuous-sounding press release, the Nebraska Secretary of State might have previewed a legal theory to nullify an abortion rights amendment on the ballot this fall
lawyers and law professors don't have a monopoly on legal analysis, but I'd advise being skeptical of a hot take proffered by someone without any apparent legal education.
I sooooo want to watch it, but my efforts so far to stream it have failed. How do you access it?