As Referees: I know some who simply refuse to referee for type 1 (for-profit) journals. Also reasonable: refereeing for them only if they pay compensation, saving pro bono refereeing for only non-profit (type 3 and 2) journals. /8 #philsky#PoliTheory
As Authors: It’s unrealistic to think we could at this point submit to only type 3 (& 2) journals. But it IS realistic to heavily favour them, esp. in political #philsky#PoliTheory, since there are now several type 3 (diamond open access) journals (JESP, PP, F&E, Ergo, Phil Imprint). /7
The solution: These for-profit publishers rely on our labour as *authors*, *referees*, and *editors*. We can help build momentum to the diamond open access model in all three roles. How? /6 #philsky#PoliTheory
🧵on academic journal publishing (in light of the recent controversy in #philsky#PoliTheory): I think we have a choice to make—both individually and, collectively, as an intellectual community. /1
