'Tide of corruption' is not just a neat summary: it could also work well as a band name #papermill#academicwritinghttp://deevybee.blogspot.com/2024/09/using-pubpeer-to-screen-editors.html
Yes, agree. But many authors don't respond. One thing I do in pubpeer comments is document my attempts to contact the authors. See pubpeer.com/publications...
Our PubPeer comments are here: Girona and Drymoni (2024, Nature Communications): pubpeer.com/publications...pubpeer.com/publications...pubpeer.com/publications...pubpeer.com/publications... (continued)...
This is our fifth analysis demonstrating that earthquake precursor behavior proposed in the scientific literature does not exist. Our scientific paper analyses are free to read, forever. Comments can be left either on our post or on PubPeer.
All to say some boring media criticism from CJ is all of these Science/Nature articles fleshing out PubPeer rumors need fewer shocked responses and more people saying "I knew that fucker was lying, and here's why"
Plenty has been written about the metascience saga of the NHB paper High Replicability... Unfortunately, much of this transient discourse isn't on the PubPeer page for the retracted article. Capturing these critiques would be a great lesson for future researchers. #metascience
This looks like an interesting review of PubPeer activity, though. asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....@infotainment.bsky.social
This study explores the use of PubPeer by the scholarly community, to understand the issues discussed in an online journal club, the disciplines most commented on, and the characteristics of the most....
No, I'm more of a lurker. I have the browser plug-in mostly to notify me when a paper I'm looking at (or other citations on the page) have comments on PubPeer. However, it may be useful for authors too, to post minor corrections or clarifications.
Saw a couple new responses to the PubPeer poll and thought I'd repost this to #EpiSky@episconroy.bsky.social@timpmorris.bsky.social@publichealth.bsky.social