I just took a client website built in in 1998 using layer upon layer of nested tables, and—through sheer force of will and lots of regex—wrestled it into something approaching semantic HTML. So I’m taking my win and calling it a day. 😎

Paulinho, can we have Regex in that menu to silence specific words? and also be able to mute embedded urls as well, just like we have in skyfeed?

Vc tpa usando o Skyfeed pra fazer? Dei uma lida numa tabela de Regex pra jogar os termos lá: www.rexegg.com/regex-quicks...

Eu gosto mais da manipulação de lista com map/filter etc E regex no js também é melhor

Not intentionally. RegEx isn't my strong suit. I just found a pattern that worked and kept duplicating it. I know I could do something fancy and wrap several of those into one statement, but sometimes crude works so there's no point in elegant.

WIth Skyfeed, I stopped trying to make complex one-size-fits-all all regex and just brute-forced it.

I really wish @skyfeed.app was more transparent about their regular expression matching. A little time spent on documentation would save literally hours of time for people like me in trying to diagnose why a regex that works in every standard library I’ve tried doesn’t work in skyfeed.

I was kind of wondering why some students seem to be trying to stick to lm(), even though all the notes use brm(), as if it were easier somehow. And then I thought about how I've still been double escaping all my regex even though R has had raw string formatting since v4.0

don't worry rem I got u

Like I can only see two takeaways 1) This was the first of like 900 bear-traps like this in their code. There is no way that was the only time that regex was referenced, and unlikely it was the only regex 2) Do you HONESTLY believe Actual Hackers are not salivating at working out this massive flaw?