Currently writing a motion for reconsideration from a Court of Appeals opinion holding that Georgia's anti-SLAPP law does not always protect statements of opinion, because the standard is "low." /1
Not at all! Our statements are not at odds. ^_^
I'm sure there were intelligent people who found his statements totally unbelievable and said, "Well, that's just Adolf being Adolf. No one would actually do those things."
Bluesky's Top 10 Trending Words from the Past 10 Minutes: ️⚠️💨3 - clipperindigenouscolumbustyphlosiongazaodetejupiterpeoplesthanksgivingpediria (tap/click to see all posts on Bluesky featuring that word!) #йобанарусня
People will seriously ask questions like "Why can't the press put in the headline that Trump told vicious lies?" Well, that would violate their ethical principle of neutral reporting, for one thing. They can certainly report that the statements are not true, but they can't call him vile for it.
Oh, you pretend to be an anti-genocide Zionist. But who voted for Netanyahu, and what ideological base is he standing on? You realize there is not a single Jewish party in the Knesset that opposes the occupation? And that the genocidal statements come from up and down Zionist society?Oh, you pretend to be an anti-genocide Zionist. But who voted for Netanyahu, and what ideological base is he standing on? You realize there is not a single Jewish party in the Knesset that opposes the occupation? And that the genocidal statements come from up and down Zionist society?
true. it's all persuasive, propaganda, statements like that, to a greater or lesser degree. I'm gonna make sure I vote and I hope you have a wonderful day. you're great, I always look up when I pop up in the timeline
The difference would allow us to clearly see what the author actually said versus what he wanted us to believe. If the gap is too wide, it’s a clear signal that the author needs to back up his statements with more facts. And only then should we consider emotionally investing in their message. 10/11
I got that. I just think you're making a leap that doesn't serve anyone, instead of pointing out the absurdities of the statements.