An âamount equal toâ X may be assumed to be an amount no more or less than X. But this went all the way to the Supreme Court ([2010] UKSC 40), which decided 4-3 that it didnât mean that, rather an amount < or = X.
And the one I was thinking of: www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKSc... X3
YouTube video by Brew
"It was settled in Wyatt v Vince [2015] UKSC 14, [2015] 1 FLR 972 that the court cannot strike-out/give summary judgment on a legally recognisable application.." Read more: https://buff.ly/3N50LpB
The Commons Library đ˘âŞď¸ has revamped its paper on the UK Supreme Court, which turns 15 this month. Special thanks to the UKSC team for helping us compile some really nerdy new data on the use of senior territorial judges in UKSC/JCPC cases! More â¤ľď¸ commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-bri...
Nice post celebrating the 15th anniversary of the UKSC, although I'm not sure I've understood the reference to the court not always pleasing 'activist liberals' (am I an activist liberal if I think that, says, the Begum case was wrongly decided?)
So, you then get appeals all the way up to and including the UKSC based upon a misunderstanding of force majeure. Meaning none of the cases make any sense. FFS. /ends
Aaarrrgghh. I've wasted all morning puzzzling over RTI Ltd v MUr in the UKSC www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2... A case that makes *no sense* because of the way appeals from the decisions of arbitrators work. /1
On visibly uncontrolled asylum, such as small boats. Whatever pros/cons of Rwanda-type schemes in principle/practice, UKSC ruled such a scheme compatible with international obligations if third country has functioning asylum system which meets key standards(Rwanda didn't, but ECHR wasn't the block)
New on UK Labour Law blog: Nicola Countouris and @colmocinneide.bsky.socialuklabourlawblog.com/2024/09/25/t...
Image by markusspiske from pixabay 1. Introduction This blogpost revisits the 2011 UK Supreme Court decision in Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, which adopted a narrow reading of the personal scope o...