Lectures by Great Barrington Declaration experts in mass misinformation happening at Stanford, and the whole international academic community is silently accepting this, as normal. What is going on?? Where are the Bioethicists?? Are we supposed to accept this as academic freedom?? Really?
There is a growing concern among bioethicists that yes, medical staff do reach for euthanasia far too quickly after disasters, natural or otherwise, and justify it by saying the system was overwhelmed. bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Background Natural disasters are becoming more frequent and severe and profoundly impact the end-of-life care experience, including service provision. There is a paucity of research examining healthca...
While many bioethicists focused on empirical methodologies in the last decades, non-empirical methods lost attention. Since empirical and non-empirical methods mutually need each other for normative claims, we mapped their use for ethics research on digital medicine, healthcare and public health.
The best possible reason for transcending unmodified human biology is to spite bioethicists
I wonder who else might be interested: public health ethicists, bioethicists, legal scholars, public health/policy experts, health policy folks, etc.
Just a couple of bioethicists melting on the floor of a train.
Very interesting. Q: How do the suggested principles complement PH ethics principles (Kass or others), and why are public health ethics principles insufficient for addressing war? It often feels like bioethicists are knowledgeable about population-level bioethics but reluctant to use this approach
I suspect they're bioethicists in same way SBF's parents were economic ethicists. Their job isn't to say "no" but to explain how to rich patrons