It's always a pleasure to see a popular Threads account with fediverse-sharing enabled. Despite such a vast difference in the platforms, we can achieve a human connection. But fediverse integration in Threads is still in a sorry state over a year since launch. They need to be able to follow us […]

@Gargron The same is true for Bluesky bridge. It's very cool it exists, and it's also cool there is an opt-in mechanism. However the implementation of opt-in matters. The simplistic approach breaks discoverability, mentions, ability to communicate, all of which would also be possible to solve […]

@Gargron I agree! To be able to share is great! But I do not like Threads very much, too much similar to Instagram. There's a certain smell, I don't know 😅

@Gargron@filippodb In effetti non è male 😅

@Gargron I agree. I’ve seen favourites in reverse (from there to here) from Threads staff so they are still working on it - but my guess is it is very under resourced and/or buried in privacy and legal concerns. @zuck and @mosseri need to push it.

@Gargron > fediverse integration in Threads is still in a sorry state over a year since launch. They need to be able to follow us back. They need to see when we mention them I presume it's working as designed. Just enough crippled interop to muddy the waters when they're fending off […]

@Gargron#Bluesky#Fediverse#ActivityPub is entirely out of your hands […]

@Gargron This shit is on purpose. Meta doesn't want to be part of the Fediverse, they want to own it like they want to own everything. Since that is not possible (and we all say thankya), they are going for hegemonic control by making it so that Threads users have no inducement to talk to the […]

@Gargron agreed. But are they really committed to seeing this to the end that works for both platforms? It is something I am not sure about. After all, it's zuck. Who knows with that guy.

@Gargron Hope they are listening.