Vance is so slippery about what he is about and wants to do, and Project 2025 is one of the more irrefutable windows into the kind of policies we can look forward to with Trump/Vance.
To be a bit pedantic, it's not liberalism, it's post-liberalism. The Vance's of the world believe in government support of families, but primarily for the types of families they think are best. It's authoritarianism.
Can someone explain how we had a whole debate with the guy who wrote the foreward to the Project 2025 leader's book, and it didn't even come up?
It's wild that the debate was a contest between how smoothly one side can lie his face off versus whether the other side can debunk horseshit in real tone while looking suave.
He wants open floor plan near downtown and she wants farmhouse in the exurbs, but one thing they do agree on is bidding up the housing prices for the people who deserve to be here.
He's an MS13 fentanyl smuggler and she's a stay at home mother of anchor babies. Will they be able to stretch their $750k budget to find their dream home in Indianapolis?
I mean, is there any other headline? It gives me some sense of sanity that it's being reported that way. Because really, is any of the policy theater worth a damn if one side is delegitimizing the entire enterprise?
Timmy woke up at the end. Would have liked that from the start.
With the book, or other things, too?
