I dislike the replication crisis framing of open science reforms by both skeptics & proponents (itself an interesting case study in how scandals & psych drive discourse). Every major OS reform (open data, methods, study registration, open access) predates the replication crisis, some several decades

Agreed... down thread, I note there may be really good reasons to do this. Even if all of the published research is correct, sharing data/code can facilitate reuse. Preprints and self-archiving improve accessibility and allow for feedback before publication. Registration is great in medicine.

This is not to say that more and better evidence aren't a good idea -- I'm very much in favor -- but "replicability" is a very limited outcome & mainly of interested to a very specific subset of science (both social & otherwise)