The thing about taking statutory interpretation away from the agencies is that Congress actually has power over those agencies, but does not have power over the Court. It’s power grab in the guise of helping; it’s “helping” in a paternalistic, condescending, unchecked manner.
This is again, a crisis brought on by the functional collapse of impeachment as an enforcement mechanism.
Ah I see. Fuck.
Seems to me that Congress has the same control over a court's interpretation of a statute as it does over an administrative agencies, at least barring constitutional issues. Congress can pass laws amending statutes, reversing court interpretations of statutes, and so on.
We need a fundamental reconfiguration of the institutional relationships www.liberalcurrents.com/lets-wreck-s...
It may be difficult to believe today, but Congress was once a force to be reckoned with. The pinnacle of this, of course, was Reconstruction, during which Congress regularly overrode the president’s v...
Exactly where these people want us
i hate how we're basically being ruled by an oligarchy that can't be voted out
this has been driving me crazy about the court's jurisprudence here, congress is fully capable of telling the agencies what to do and uses that power often, it doesn't need to be saved by the courts
My read is that your inserting poorly educated ideological judges into complex scientific decisions. How far off am I?
This must be challenged. SCOTUS must be stopped. (Cannot believe I am texting that).
It takes a lot of labor and expertise that Congress simply doesn’t have to transform legislation into workable policy. Once upon a time I was involved in this process and I just can’t get my head around the absurd implications of this ruling.