BLUE
Login
Profile banner
D
drew
@adrew.dadguy.online
your favorite poster's favorite poster. pain in the ass but a delight. i like plants a lot. pretty much any sport is chill. love soccer and F1. Gardening feed hype man. He/him "Built like mewtoo" - grg
2.2k followers441 following33.4k posts
Dadrew.dadguy.online

Betting that artists are dependent on your platform for discoverability of their tracks and then leveraging that bet by not paying 2/3s of them for their work is some "you're gonna get the guillotine first" type decision making if I do say so myself

PWmarkpopham.bsky.social

I'm sorry isn't this.... theft???

Spotify's decision to stop paying royalties on less popular tracks is "discriminatory and exploitative", says competition law expert By Matt Mullen Others have suggested that the move indicates Spotify may eventually begin charging artists to host their music on the platform Last week, Music Business Worldwide reported that Spotify is planning to make some drastic changes to its royalty model in 2024.
The most controversial of these is the decision to stop paying royalties to the artists and rightsholders behind tracks that are streamed less than 1000 times annually, a move that will effectively demonetize more than two-thirds of its entire catalogue.
1
GCgavcortland.bsky.social

Also…this really should be illegal. 🤨

0
Profile banner
D
drew
@adrew.dadguy.online
your favorite poster's favorite poster. pain in the ass but a delight. i like plants a lot. pretty much any sport is chill. love soccer and F1. Gardening feed hype man. He/him "Built like mewtoo" - grg
2.2k followers441 following33.4k posts
HomePopularExplore