ok a state attorney general launching an investigation of an organization for publishing obviously first amendment protected criticism of a billionaire’s business practices at the behest of said billionaire is not like the best place to be in, democracy wise

One thing I've realized this year is there's a major dividing line in parenting: Before your kid's old enough to look in the trash and realize you've been eating their Halloween candy, and after your kid's old enough to look in the trash and realize you've been eating their Halloween candy

I swear I get the joke but I'm choosing to believe you meant your boss is your cat and I believe this obligates you to post a picture of said cat. (Bonus points if it's wearing a tie or carrying a briefcase.)

I know they get talked about a lot here on the Internet and all but can I just say: Cats, man. What a weird fuckin' species

I know some people say that questioning details about horrific stories is a way of downplaying or denying the horror, but it’s really not: wartime propaganda is corrosive and insidious and a tool for manipulation, and truth is worth caring about even in the face of utter tragedy.

I take great offense at the idea I'd waste my greatest lies on you rather than using them on my kid. I'm also offended that you clearly haven't looked closely at my profile picture.

Thought maybe it was a double? I dunno, man, I've never been a whiskey person

Couldn't you save a fair amount by buying a case of the whiskey and keeping it at home instead of ordering it a bar?

If anyone is at all curious as to why researchers like myself and my colleagues are under attack (covered in the WA Post this weekend) perhaps some of our papers might be of interest. Here's a recent one on participatory disinformation and the 2020 election: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....

Welcome to the club!