I did actually, though I admit I did not look at your article, until now. I did not say that some people had not argued that, just that I had not seen that. But that it is a flawed argument to make if you install clean energy = being a climate leader. I also politely ask you look at my link.
...Then there's land, the vast open and sparse land with dry and windy conditions makes it a perfect place to not only deploy renewables but also get rich from it. Of course that does not mean they will produce less oil and gas...
Texas, a major oil producer, is also a leader in clean energy, setting records in solar and wind power generation. Despite political resistance, it plans to install a substantial amount of clean energ...
...most capacity. The case for Texas is mainly about the need and thirst for energy as a result of bitcoin mining, data centres being built in Texas, AI tech deployed and climate fueled extreme heat causing more reliance on AC systems...
Hi @ketanjoshi.co , personally I have not seeing any make that comparison and it is a bit of a silly one to make. In the US, in the majority of cases, adding renewable capacity has never been out of the concern for climate change as it is the red republican climate denying states that's deploying...
If just that storm had broken the heat, such as muggy evening and night...
Why did it shut down?
Good work 😀
France recently target a huge offshore wind expansion
France aims to expand offshore wind capacity to 45 GW by 2050, with 15 projects in the pipeline to reach this goal.
And this recent Swiss referendum vote was pretty interesting too
Switzerland's direct democracy allows citizens to shape policies, as seen in the recent support for a renewable energy law.
