The English article published by MELG probably won't be (unless the author's institution pays for it), but if it ends up being one of the articles Siyasat Arabiya decides to translate, the Arabic version will be open access.
I'll take this as an opportunity to pitch the special issue I'm editing. Maybe this will motivate you. www.dohainstitute.org/en/News/Page...
Siyasat Arabiya and Middle East Law & Governance (MELG) are pleased to announce this call for papers for dual special issues on quantitative methods in the political science of...
This is awesome. You should definitely write up the paper.
Did you see my blog post on sensitive surveys in Tunisia? (I'm hoping this will become a paper one day 😅) www.robertkubinec.com/post/kais_sa...
Thank you very much!
Finally, I conduct a number of empirical analyses of WVS data to examine whether the patterns support the use of nonresponse rates as a proxy for PF. The article is open access. If you have any feedback or would like to discuss the topic further, please feel free to contact me.
The paper provides a very simple model of survey response to sensitive questions that is used to formalize my core argument. This is then used to run a simulation that demonstrates why nonresponse rates and sensitivity due to PF don't necessarily move in the same direction.
I have two goals with this paper: 1. Contribute to the conversation on preference falsification and how it influences survey response; and, 2. Encourage more theorizing of the relationship between our measures and the underlying concepts we're trying to measure.
It's also important to note that the ability to keep track of the number of Palestinians killed by Israeli forces has been deteriorating.
Let's just wait and see if he uses this moment to become another right-wing free speech grifter. He actually looks like he's happy they arrested him.