amazon, surprisingly
fair enough. thank you
I do appreciate the conversation and while we don't agree, I thank you for being respectful. have a good evening.
I promise I'm not being snarky here, but is this info supposed to change my stance in any way? - shitty T&S - no apology My point still stands. Perhaps you're saying they didn't intentionally exclude the racial slur? Again, I value impact over intention. And accountability goes a long way.
I don't see that in the dictionary. where are you getting your definition from?
do you realize you're victim blaming here? I don't think that you do, but you are. Blaming someone for how they protest injustice isn't cool, especially if it's non-violent. If people protest at the oppressor's comfort level, then it's not really a protest, is it?
for what it's worth, I saw the screenshot somewhere else, not here. and your beef should be with the staff that allowed the slur. Not the people who informed others that it exists.
I, a Black person who the racial slur targets, have no problem with the screenshot being circulated. I actually wanted to see it for myself to form my own conclusion. why does it bother you that it was circulated?
circulating is a smoke signal. again, we need to know of danger. why would you *not* want everyone to know that this blatant racism is allowed?