Can you tell the difference? I won't spoil it but let's just say it's not as hard as discerning #AIleonfurze.com/deepfa... 2/2
Real or Fake? The AI Deepfake Game As Generative AI becomes more capable, it’s getting harder and harder to spot AI-generated images. Powerful image generation models like Flux (available thr…
Quote from my latest post: tachyon.substack.com...
- The ability to interrupt is a big quality of life improvement on v1... - ...but the transcripts are very hit and miss, especially when you are doing a lot of interrupting or are switching language - It refuses to sing even though it can. 2/3
There's a big problem with Altman's working out here. The statistical effect for 1:1 tutoring is 30+ years old, only applied to two contexts with small samples, referred to *human tutoring* not AI tutors, and - the kicker - *has never been replicated* 3/ www.educationnext.org/two-sigma-tu...
An experimental intervention in the 1980s raised certain test scores by two standard deviations. It wasn’t just tutoring, and it’s never been replicated, but it continues to inspire.
I just turned it off as well. Not surprising but also not cool
The best thing about it is how easy it is to make adjustments. I went through 6x versions before I had one I was happy to share, although by v2 it was already doing exactly what I needed.
This question is inspired by the recent EdSurge podcast (www.edsurge.com/news/2024-08...marcwatkins.substack.com/p/the-artifi...) - both of which I recommend taking a look at.
Two instructors made AI chatbot versions of themselves to help teach their classes, and they say class discussion improved as a result.
online v face to face