BLUE
Profile banner
MC
Master Crale
@badgerinasuit.taxbadger.com
21+, Badger in a Suit. Expect NSFW content! Gay/Aego Ace, He/Him/Sir
490 followers388 following585 posts

As of July 1st, in the state of Washington, it will be illegal to remove your chastity cage without your keyholder's consent. I'm not kidding. lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/202...

28

Gpurpleghostkit.bsky.social

I am interested to how this will be litigated. Like how is "sexually protective device" defined. This bill doesn't have an internal definition. This also has a chance to create bad precedents as well as good ones. Chastity belts specifically are sometimes used in abusive scenarios.

1
Mmasterdomonic.bsky.social

May I screenshot this and share to other platforms? I can write My own post if not, but I think you said it perfectly, and I dont just want to swipe your post/content without your permission!

2
OPitsoasus.fastestfurs.com

wait what?wait what?

2
HHhuskershusky.bsky.social

I need to unlock by June 30th then as I live there 😩

1
PNpunksnotdead.bsky.social

Ooh! This sounds like it's about people who removes condoms/diaphragms etc without telling their partner first! If I'm reading it right, it's supposed to help prevent people from getting trapped with someone via on-purpose unwanted pregnancy. Neat!

0
Ssylvette.bsky.social

I mean, from what I can tell, this law explicitly refers to "sexual contact or sexual penetration." Technically, a chastity cage could fit the law's definition, but it would have to involve taking the cage off during sexual contact and then continuing to engage in sexual contact without consent.

Snippet of Washington House Bill 1958, page 2, lines 7-13. The words "sexual contact or sexual penetration" are highlighted.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. CIVIL CAUSE OF ACTION. (1) A person who engaged in sexual contact or sexual penetration with another person may bring a civil action against that other person if prior to sexual contact or sexual penetration both persons understood and agreed that a sexually protective device would be used, and the other person:
(a) Engaged or continued to engage in sexual contact or sexual penetration after the other person:
1
OMorcmilk.bsky.social

Finally some good news

0

@badgerinasuit.taxbadger.com It seems like it's technically supposed to be focused on condoms, but for the life of me I can't imagine why they put 5 GRAND as the base fine lmao

0
AScabalittle.bsky.social

Only if the cage was to prevent pregnancy or STIs 😞

1
Profile banner
MC
Master Crale
@badgerinasuit.taxbadger.com
21+, Badger in a Suit. Expect NSFW content! Gay/Aego Ace, He/Him/Sir
490 followers388 following585 posts