It's very frustrating that San Francisco, a city that's usually considered environmentally progressive, brought this case. They teed the Court up to rip another hole in the Clean Water Act only two terms after it severely limited the law's geographic scope in Sackett v. EPA (2023)

A friend resigned from the EPA over this.

It'll be the second case argued this morning, so stay tuned for my insightful* commentary** after the veterans case being argued now wraps up *unhinged **ranting

San Francisco, a city so progressive it regularly produces fewer housing units than Alexandria does and then wonders why rents and homelessness rates keep rising? That San Francisco? Place is seriously coasting on its reputation.

Any hope that because it’s San Francisco bringing the case that the conservatives might reflexively oppose it?