As you’d expect, more direct replication articles were published over time but this increase was small and statistically suggestive (p = .017). It is an open question as to whether this trend will continue in future years. (4/9)

We also found that journals with a stated policy of considering replication submissions (31% of journals in our sample) were 7.85 times more likely to publish direct replication articles than those without such a policy. (5/9)

people are beginning to recognize that replications are not as useful as those who do them would make out, and also realizing that the replications that were done were just low effort attempts that often got to the wrong answer. e.g., ML4, Wagenmakers and ManySmiles, there are many examples