BLUE
Profile banner
JS
Jesse Shapiro
@bjesseshapiro.bsky.social
Macrobe qui aime les microbes www.shapirolab.ca/
539 followers349 following181 posts
JSbjesseshapiro.bsky.social

Across all 11 species, we see an enrichment of selection on genes involved in metabolism. Notably, amino acid transport & metabolism is particularly enriched in species predicted to be resistant to glyphosate, which targets an amino acid synthesis pathway. 13/n

1
JSbjesseshapiro.bsky.social

So genome-wide sweeps may be rare, or not very repeatable on these short time scales. Can we still find genes targeted by selection? Yes! Using 5 different methods, we find a bunch of candidate genes with parallel SNV changes, allele frequency changes, or copy-number variations in treated ponds.

1
JSbjesseshapiro.bsky.social

Comparing controls to Roundup ponds after 4 weeks, there was little evidence for complete genome-wide sweeps, which would look like big blocks of either yellow or dark blue (fixed alleles) in treated ponds. Instead, we see a mix of colours, showing that genome-wide diversity is maintained. 11/n

1
JSbjesseshapiro.bsky.social

Within-species diversity was pretty high (hundreds to thousands of single-nucleotide variants; SNVs) per megabasepair, but was not correlated with species richness. 10/n

Scatter plot of species richness (community diversity) on the x-axis and within-species diversity on the y-axis. Trend lines show a flat relationship in most of the 11 species (MAGs).
0
JSbjesseshapiro.bsky.social

As expected, the glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) Roundup affects community diversity, cutting species richness in half! We were also able to measure within-species diversity in 11 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) recovered from both Roundup-treated ponds and controls. 9/n

Box plot showing higher species richness in control ponds compared to GBH (Roundup) treated ponds
1
JSbjesseshapiro.bsky.social

Based on previous experiments, we knew that Roundup selects for ‘ecological’ changes in the bacterioplankton community composition. Now we wanted to know if it also selects for changes within species, aka evolution. 8/n onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...journals.asm.org/doi/full/10....

1
JSbjesseshapiro.bsky.social

As a midpoint between natural diversity with unknown selective pressures and lab experiments, we settled on a freshwater mesocosm communities faced with a known selective pressure (the herbicide Roundup) compared to controls. Superfluous LEAP music video :P www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6ga... 6/n

Large Experimental Array of Ponds (LEAP)
Large Experimental Array of Ponds (LEAP)

YouTube video by Andrew Gonzalez

1
JSbjesseshapiro.bsky.social

Why does this matter? On a fundamental level, if gene-sweeps are common, we can think of genes rather than genomes as the entities that inhabit ecological niches. More tangibly, if genome-wide diversity is frequently purged, this could affect bacterial community structure via evo-eco feedbacks. 4/n

1
JSbjesseshapiro.bsky.social

Here’s a cartoon contrasting genome-wide vs. gene-specific selective sweeps from a little review I wrote a while back: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Schematic contrasting genome-wide selective sweeps, which purge genetic diversity genome-wide, and gene-specific sweeps which only purge diversity locally in genes targeted by selection.
0
Profile banner
JS
Jesse Shapiro
@bjesseshapiro.bsky.social
Macrobe qui aime les microbes www.shapirolab.ca/
539 followers349 following181 posts