Ironically, the level of vitriol in response to @jemima.bsky.social's column on the echoey nature of the BlueSky chamber has matched any twitter pile on I've ever seen, only with an added dose of self-righteousness. (1/11)

I think it's mostly that it's paywalled so most of us can't actually read past the headline

slob a dog’s knob, Bob

If it's such a good point, where are the converse major media pieces demanding that libs and progressives start stinking places like Gab and Truth Social up in the same manner with which the journos constantly clamor for nazis to post here?

It seems that the proper Bluesky response should be "Block the FT and move on." No one needs an echo chamber full of Nazis with their constant sieg-heiling, and whatnot.

Sorry, dude. We’ve already had the “Debate me, Bro” debate. You lost.

It seems quite presumptuous to assume what people want from a social media platform or how they should use it. Some people want a bubble. There is no way for the mythical "town square" to work with millions of people in it.

You are now the 2nd most blocked person on Bluesky in the last 24 hours. You are also very close to more blocks then follows. Maybe you would be happier on birdsite, the Actual Echochamber.

bro who tf are you and why would I read your 11 post thread lmfao

I didn’t see a pile on and no vitriol. I saw mirth and puns. A little eye rolling. Okay, maybe a lot of eye rolling. Her article was laughable, not insightful.