The Ego Has Landed: The Observer review of Character Limit: How Elon Musk destroyed Twitter www.theguardian.com/books/2024/s...
New York Times reporters Kate Conger and Ryan Mac paint a damning portrait of the billionaire who turned the social media platform into a smaller business and a larger cesspool
CJEU, new cases I Asylum law I What happens if a Member State which is responsible for asylum-seekers under the Dublin rules simply refuses to take them?
CJEU, new cases Free movement of people: Irish court asks the CJEU to clarify when EU citizens retain worker status after becoming unemployed, ie how to interpret the conditions of one year's employment and being registered as a job-seeker; also a question about the EU citizen's procedural rights
4/ Even if CJEU misinterprets the law and purports to find that relocation is mandatory, it doesn't follow that it will find that it is unlawful. After all, it previously upheld an emergency asylum law that actually did require relocation of asylum-seekers: eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2017/09/a-py...
Professor Steve Peers How should the EU deal with the perceived ‘migrant/refugee crisis’? It has done a number of things, but ...
3/ In reality the new law replacing the Dublin rules does not require relocation of asylum-seekers between Member States. It's explicitly voluntary for Member States. My discussion of the new law here - eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-...
2/ I don't normally predict the outcome of pending cases, but in my view this challenge is incredibly weak. It challenges the straw man version of the new law that exists only in the RW populist cinematic universe, not the law that exists in reality.
CJEU, new cases III Asylum law II: French National Assembly (in fact, the Le Pen party) challenges the validity of part of the new Asylum Pact, namely the replacement for the Dublin rules on responsibility for asylum seekers 1/
Here's Giuliani's attorney's letter motion requesting the delay storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
In an emergency hearing today, Judge Liman gave Rudy Giuliani's new attorney until Oct. 8 to file a brief opposing the sale of Giuliani's Palm Beach condo to begin to satisfy the $146 million defamation judgment against him. The attorney had missed the court's Sep. 23 deadline for the motion.
Rudolph Giuliani can, for the moment, hold on to his Palm Beach, Fla., condo rather than sell it to satisfy a $146 million defamation judgment awarded to two Georgia poll workers, a federal judge orde...
2/ That part of the investigation is distinct from the issues for which the Commission has already made a preliminary finding of DSA breach against X, back in July ec.europa.eu/commission/p... (The Commission will take a final decision on this after assessing X's reply)
Highlights, press releases and speeches