BLUE
Profile banner
BB
Brandon Bishop
@brandontbishop.bsky.social
Seismologist, investigates the Andes and subduction zones, post doc at St. Louis University Replies to my geoscience posts that include ChatGPT content get hidden and get your account blocked.
1.3k followers2.3k following3.4k posts

This line of think about knowledge and practice fundamentally renders any scientist working at the bleeding edge pre-scientific? Like, we have no great understanding of how cracks open in rock (not at the level of detail and certainty demanded here), so all seismology is pre-scientific? 😐

Non-cropped post reading "Take for example an ancient blacksmith. He doesn't understand how work hardening reshapes the atomic matrix of iron, because he doesn't know it has an atomic matrix. He understands that if he cold-hammers it, it gets harder, but not why! Likewise he may understand thst overcharging the charcoal in his bloom or sealing his iron with organic materials under heat produces a stronger metal. He may even understand it is different from regular iron. But he does not know his iron is absorbing carbon to make steel."
1

We have no way of knowing how much energy is released during an earthquake (an unrecoverable amount of energy goes into friction), so earthquake source properties are pre-scientific? (The grad student I know working on with might say, "yes" 🙂)

1
Profile banner
BB
Brandon Bishop
@brandontbishop.bsky.social
Seismologist, investigates the Andes and subduction zones, post doc at St. Louis University Replies to my geoscience posts that include ChatGPT content get hidden and get your account blocked.
1.3k followers2.3k following3.4k posts