Ok. Yes, that is also protected speech.
Who are you quoting?
Fair. I guess I'm inclined to put this EM statement in the "stupid but legal" basket. Not sure how anyone could be liable for it.
It's protected by the 1A. Section 230 is not relevant.
You are welcome to plagiarize, if you're willing to have my terrible ideas attributed to you.
Here's the poster for my upcoming talk at the Harvard English department. Tuesday, Sept. 24 at 5pm. I hope to see you there!
Iāll be doing a talk on Uncreativity & the Future of Art for the Harvard English department on Tuesday, Sept. 24 at 5pm. Would be delighted to see my Boston friends!
I just posted @IpseDixitPod #804, featuring @MJSteilen of @UBSchoolofLaw discussing his article "Magna Carta & the Origins of Legislative Power." Excellent article & fascinating discussion w/ implications for const. interp. shows.acast.com/ipse-dixit/e...
A Podcast on Legal Scholarship
I just published an essay for Right Click Save about the lawsuit Jonathan Mann & I filed against the SEC & how it intersects with my legal scholarship & conceptual artworks. www.rightclicksave.com/article/why-...
Artist and law professor Brian L. Frye makes the case that art is not a security, even if you sell it as an NFT
I was quoted in this interesting article on memecoins & pump.funwww.theblock.co/post/315442/...