Vance is a good debater because he is a smooth and confident liar. He looks directly into the camera with a benign expression and lies over and over again. If you win a debate by lying, the American people are the ones who really lose. I'm tapping out, I already know how I'm voting.
Crap. I knew that's how it would go.
I'm surprised by the number of people who thought Walz would crush Vance. Vance is not a78 year old man with poor impulse control. He's a practiced liar.
Yeah, I made it through the first question. In order to avoid me throwing something at the tv or tearing all my hair out, I had to turn it off. Can’t wait to ignore the coverage in which the media conflates *winning* with *convincingly saying literally anything regardless of objective reality*.
