Pretty awesome that @economeager.bsky.social@timpmorris.bsky.socialrottenandgood.substack.comtpmorris.substack.com
Either rotten or good, or both rotten and good. Click to read The Universal and the Vacuous Events, by Rachael Meager, a Substack publication with hundreds of subscribers.
this has made me nostalgic for when I used mutt as my email client!
oh hellllll no
this place really lacks a Main Character Of The Day
if u see this post a bridge
yeah, that's why I said possible hot take. I don't like extremely long articles (which as you say are common in some fields) but at the same time, if complicated statistical methods are used in an article, the methods section should be allowed to describe them sufficiently!
I would like to think that's an ice cold take that we all agree on
possible hot take: methods sections should also be excluded from word counts
wait what's the debate, do people pronounce it somehow other than "dee plier"? I don't think I've heard anything else in real life
Psychologists: god i hate it when tv shows portray our entire discipline as if it fossilized at Freud Also psychologists: philosophy of science (Popper, 1963) tells us that falsifiability makes science, and that’s why we need statistics (Fisher, 1925)