The entire idea of outsourcing the scientific ecosystem to LLMs — as described below — is a concept error that I can scarcely begin to get my head around. sakana.ai/ai-scientist/
Wait...the AI-generated reports are going to be peer-reviewed by...AI?
"While there are still occasional flaws in the papers produced by this first version..." Meanwhile the authors note that the output itself fails to meet standards of scientific rigor, but treat this as a minor wrinkle, not a fundamental barrier imposed by using the wrong tool for the wrong job.
Most The Onion articles are more believable
wtf are these dipshits
It's hilarious to me that "sacana" is Brazilian slang for something in the general vicinity of "bastard", "scam artist" and "asshole"
if they improve the quality of the papers enough that they're consistently discovering new facts about reality, will you really be happy? would that really be good? it sounds horrifying to me
Complete nonsense. And welcome to the brave new world of imaginary field work
These are deeply unserious people who deserve to be mocked and then ignored.
Yikes! This would be a good satire of itself.
“The Ai scientist”