reviewer 1 is clearly skeptical of the value here, writing: "In the first sentence of this review report, I purposely refer to this study as a ‘sensitivity analysis’ of the LPI because, to me, that is all that it is."

The authors include a line-by-line code review that identifies 30 errors in the published LPI code; though all with much smaller numerical impact than the math issues that receive the focus. (Rev 1: 'I didn't feel it was necessary to review the code because it wouldn't change my assessment.')